<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest IDLookup Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.re-decoded.com/2009/02/latest-idlookup-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.re-decoded.com/2009/02/latest-idlookup-release/</link>
	<description>A technical look at the Raiser&#039;s Edge API from Blackbaud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.re-decoded.com/2009/02/latest-idlookup-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.re-decoded.com/?p=176#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>Zack,

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. With the new version the whole environment changed and while I cannot comment on exactly what is going on here I will certainly look into it.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zack,</p>
<p>Thanks for bringing this to my attention. With the new version the whole environment changed and while I cannot comment on exactly what is going on here I will certainly look into it.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.re-decoded.com/2009/02/latest-idlookup-release/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.re-decoded.com/?p=176#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>David,

We have your latest version of IDlookup and overall its very good.  However I&#039;m wondering if you can comment a bit on its performance/speed.

Recently I used it to duplicate check an excel file of 15,000 records.  I mapped First Name, Last Name, Zip, and Addresslines. In the criteria i specified to use all characters of each field. While it was processing the file, i noted various times and the record it was processing.  I then used that info to calculate the speed it was processing at (below)

TIME	Records	Ave Records Per Min
9:12	0(start)	0
10:05	5470	103.2075472
10:18	6450	75.38461538
10:44	8275	70.19230769
11:03	9454	62.05263158


As you can see, the longer/more records idlookup processes, the slower it gets.  

Even with what I consider a fast computer with a lot of ram, i still cannot duplicate check more than ~10k-15k due to this slow down. 

Can you give any suggestions on how to speed up this process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>We have your latest version of IDlookup and overall its very good.  However I&#8217;m wondering if you can comment a bit on its performance/speed.</p>
<p>Recently I used it to duplicate check an excel file of 15,000 records.  I mapped First Name, Last Name, Zip, and Addresslines. In the criteria i specified to use all characters of each field. While it was processing the file, i noted various times and the record it was processing.  I then used that info to calculate the speed it was processing at (below)</p>
<p>TIME	Records	Ave Records Per Min<br />
9:12	0(start)	0<br />
10:05	5470	103.2075472<br />
10:18	6450	75.38461538<br />
10:44	8275	70.19230769<br />
11:03	9454	62.05263158</p>
<p>As you can see, the longer/more records idlookup processes, the slower it gets.  </p>
<p>Even with what I consider a fast computer with a lot of ram, i still cannot duplicate check more than ~10k-15k due to this slow down. </p>
<p>Can you give any suggestions on how to speed up this process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

